Kapal mukha Remulla porke nakapag-asawa ng Aguilar pamilya nya. Mga Aguilar-Tobias dito Las Pinas Land graber.

Nothing is new to Philippine politics. Mud-slinging at its finest! ~LOL~

Oh, so that’s why you guys are so persistent in publishing ‘discussions’, huh?

Sakit sa pwet, reinz! =__=

Marcos was very competent. Credentials? Excellent.

Gloria was very competent. Credentials? Excellent.

Look what happened to us.

Dahil wala na si Marcos, if being competent is that of seeing another Gloria Arroyo… I would rather choose the incompetent in Noynoy who I believe has lot more integrity for me than the rest of the candidates.

I could not find the problem kung bakit labo-labo ang position nang comments here which should have been nested na pwedeng 5 succession.

And when you leave a comment, you think you lost it, baka andun lang sa taas.

Sorry from La Kapitana.

am not out to convince – am out to discuss.

you come to your own conclusions – i don’t tell you what conclusion to make out of it. do not set up strawmen when you are uncomfortable with your conclusions, i know you know better than that

one man’s fact can be mudslinging for another – i have no problem with that. but the facts are still facts – it happened and no amount of changing the labels will deny the fact that:

1 – the Hacienda Luisita Massacre happened.

2 – Noynoy may not be directly involved, but then that brings the issue of his leadership to question – if was not able rein in his family then, what makes you think he will be able to rein in his family’s anti-poor actions later on.

3 – Hacienda Luisita brings Noynoy’s indecisiveness to the fore – and shows the conflict of interest in promoting genuine land reform. Distribute land not a piece of paper for wiping one’s arse.

Paano na lang yan, every legitimate question is called “mudslinging” – that’s not new school dude… that’s effin TRAPO OLD SCHOOL

How come ratings are so down. Because they can’t seem to convince a good majority? TOINK! ~kablag~

Ratings is a function of name recall – Perlas has no name recall, has not been in the local headlines, so that’s understandable.

Moreover, given a good majority of vacuous people who would rather watch wowowee or the soppy telenovelas, they will definitely know more of celebrity sluts campaigning for politicians as against solid thinkers. That demographic wouldn’t know Al Gore or global warming, but it certainly felt the impact of Ondoy – catastrophically

Ika nga, pigs wouldn’t know what to do with a pearl.

right… dyan kayo mahinang mga tiga-FV. wala kayong convincing powers and as always parating ganito hahaha “pigs wouldn’t know what to do with a pearl” which truly applicable den to ya’all.

kaya wala kang makokonvince dito to vote for your manok, si villar man o si pearl dahil it’s not working dude. malaki na kasi ang pinagkaiba ngayong panahon with you old school books (sorry hahaha kilala na kita kasi hehe that’s not intended as insult) kami the newer generations do not believe in mudslinging

sino ba naman ang aayon senyo ni benigno na iisa ang mga linya ninyo. its sumali-kayo-sa-candidate-namen-because-we-are-intelligent-at-kayo-estupido-not-knowing-how-to-decide.

uto-uto ako pero in a completely different way hehehe in fak nasu-sulsulan pa nga ako

my KPIs are constant – whoever best fits the mold.

if in the process, new information comes out that shows one candidate fits the mold better, then I have no qualms in changing my selection.

at the very minimum, my game changer is – whoever commits to charter change, specifically, removing the pro-oligarch provisions against the foreign ownership of real estate – will be given a heavier rating in coming up with the scorecard.

That’s understandable.

Perlas is a totally different paradigm – not the same o same o paradigm.
Ika nga, pigs wouldn’t know what to do with a pearl.