Twiit me!

by reyna07 on September 11, 2007

*reading Michael Porter’s book on Competitive Strategy*

Essentially, ang sabi dito:

The essence of strategy is coping with competition. In the fight for market share, competition is not only manifested by players, rather, competition in an industry is rooted in its underlying economics, and competitive forces exist that go well beyond the established combatants in a particular industry. Jockeying for position is unbridled.

The way I read this is this: 

The fight for readership and traffic has now gone to a completely different strategic level (personal attack behind the dark curtains of the Twittlight Zone) or are we back to the Jurassic Park [(Batuhan nang pwit (mine)] era as Lorena Marzan said. But it seemed to me that my Professor on Competitive Strategy was right. You gotta adapt to the new medium and remain competitive.

CONCLUSION?  LET’S ALL JOIN THE TWITTER! AND DANCE ALLTOGIDEER!!!

So, let’s all Twiit-Twiit one another – ever ever!

To get started, you gotta read Manuel Villoria’s write-up so we could Twiitaliceousness the moral crap ascendancy of some wannabe angel arkangHell! It’s Twitter Twilight Zone. I’m new in this Twiitaliceousness and if this is the place where cheezemax isn’t get taxed, then let’s axed most some [edited per AJ's comments] of these brainless twits bloggers twits [edited per AJ's comments] who espouse nothing but animosities amongs bloggaciousness!!!! Someone told me that sometimes, you gotta be pro-active especially when they’re trying to shoot you down! 

(Disclaimer [per AJ's comments]: Not all twitters are brainless: and not all brainless are twitters.)

So, here: according to Mike Villoria:

If you’re after increased traffic to your site with the help of Twitter, here’s what I found: Twitterers will see your link while they view their Twitter “home” page. Some of them will even take the time to search the previous pages (as far back as 5 pages ago), especially if they are following a lot of people. If you want even more traffic, though, you’ll need to be charming and interesting enough so that people who are still new to Twitter will want to follow you. If they are still new, they’re probably just following a few Twitterers at the moment. And that improves the visibility of your Tweets.

Whose the bottom? Errr! What’s the bottom line? 

Let me go back to my reliable kodigo. If I translate Michael Porter according to my own exquisite royal insight which is the envy of these bloody kwa-kwa-kwakak women (hahahaha!) whose got nothing else better to say: in their fight for readership and traffic, they have to create to even the nastiest crap about personal attacks to create some buzz. The more buzz, the more traffic. The more traffic, the better your chance for some blogging money. Check out how many blogs my nemesis is maintaining? Getching her deep sick motive? This was the reason behind the personal attack against me. Bottom line? $$$ and Php.

Kontrapelo has all exhibits A to Z to prove that sa totoo lang ano? This is it Matilda! Look:

One post that catched my attention in the thread was created by es-i-ow where he posted a screenshot of his adsense earnings showing an amount of Php502,657.38.

(Disclaimer: It’s up to you dear readers to investigate as to whether or not these blogging monies are real.)

After all, the Filipino blogging community is now getting competitive and it’s getting crowded in here!  Kanya kanya nang tayuan nang Barrio Siete. It’s beginning to be very cliquesh! Are we nearing the point of dog-eat-dog? Who’d survive? For one thing, the sure survivors are those who are already well-entrenched in their niche who have already made a name. What about the wanna-wanna-bees? They are the ones who will have to fight for survival and be a cling-on. Moi? Tatanggap na lang ako nang labada habang nag-no-notaryo!

So, having said that – I will twiit and you will have to Twiit me too should you want to be Twiitted by a royalty like moi. Let’s Twiit one another together ever ever. With me into Twitting, I am assured of FRONTAL NUDITY* because of my availability, which I prefer, since I am never a fan of doing it from the BEHIND! Gitt my point? And if YOU (you know who you are!) can’t stand my opinion? You can always bend!

(Disclaimer: No women allowed to undress in front of me! Baka ako maging butete!)

Here’s my Twittallifyingerciousness! http://twitter.com/reyna_elena

UPDATE:

I was prompted to edit what I wrote in response to AJ’s comments below. Here’s what transpired in the email:

Email sent to BaklaAko:

AJ;

Sabi nga nong isang gunggung (re:brainless twit sa impeachment) Noted. HAHAHA!

But you’re right and I will edit the post to change the wording such as it’s NOT generalized. But more than 1 is plural pero edit ko pa rin yong “most” to pacify people who are reading way too much between the lines, you know. I will also add a disclaimer to the effect that “Not all twitters are brainless: and not all brainless are twitters”. So, sweetheart – PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGIES and kisses and stop reading too much because that’s not meant for you. :-) . I have to tell you, di pa tapos ang regla nang lola mo. And yes, I am very angry at these backstabbing women (these dahil alam mo na).

I am at work and I can’t blog, else baka machugi ang lola mo dito. And just to make sure that everyone knows that I respond to every comment and to your concern of being slighted – I will post this response later na lang.

I adore you!

Reynz

AJ accepted my apologies and responded positively.

 

Related Entries:

  • It’s porno, not popcorn
  • This woman is delusional
  • Arrest or Invitation?
  • Loren Legarda is that you?!
  • Related Posts with Thumbnails

    Reyna Elena Dot Com is Powered By Thesis

    Thesis Theme

    With Thesis, you need not worry about your in-site SEO. All you have to do is "just add killer content". From beginners, to the most advanced WordPress developers, Thesis makes it easy for anyone to customize it.

    { 1 trackback }

    It's porno, not popcorn.
    September 13, 2007 at 2:36 am

    { 18 comments… read them below or add one }

    ghandee September 12, 2007 at 5:41 am

    inang, hindi ko pa rin alam kung baket kelangan idaan sa twit-twit-twit. *kamot ulo*

    [Reply]

    bluepanjeet™ | OTWOMD™ September 12, 2007 at 8:25 am

    “What about the wanna-wanna-bees? They are the ones who will have to fight for survival and be a cling-on. Moi? Tatanggap na lang ako nang labada habang nag-no-notaryo!”

    hahaha. you really crack me up.

    Actually may sense ang sinabi mo. The blogosphere is for everyone kahit pa baguhan ka. It doesnt mean you’re already well established e kayo kayo na lang mag aapiran hahaha.

    BUt reynz I know many well established bloggers who doesn’t fit that kind of description. Mababait naman sila (sa akin) and no offense isa dun si Prudence na kau-tutang dila ko sa mga medical-related issues.

    baka inang hindi lang kayo pa nagkaka-blog hop pa. she’s kind and very accomodating lalo na sa mga baguhan tulad ko. baka lang friends sila ni bestfriend mo kaya syempre pinagtangol nya tulad ng pagtatangol namin sa iyo. ( wag mo ako isususmpa, nagsabi lang ako ng experience ko hahaha)

    may twitter ako inang pero inactive sya kasi nga di ko talaga magets noon kung ano logic eh. ngayon alam ko na. add kita sa twitty bird ko hahaha!!!

    [Reply]

    reynz September 12, 2007 at 10:28 am

    Hmmm…. pang-second honorable mention na tong honors ni Prudencia… (1st si Chukchak – although walang ID si chuckchak, so who knows, baka si Prudencia din yon? HAHAHA)

    Di kita susumpa Bluep, ok lang yon! :-) Am sure, they’re partners in crime and i judged them based on those nasty crap they do behind my back.

    hayaan mo matatapos na tong regla ko HAHAHA (meron pa pala!)

    [Reply]

    major September 12, 2007 at 11:27 am

    That’s one way of link baiting! Though unethical, marami ang gumagawa nito for traffic/popularity which will give way to monetization.
    I really wonder why they are doing that technique kahit naman maraming way to monetize your site/blog online na hindi gumagamit ng personal attacks…
    Teka, sino ba un? Basahin ko nga muna mga previous posts mo :-)

    [Reply]

    reynz September 12, 2007 at 11:45 am

    major,

    read my DELUSIONAL ENTRY.

    [Reply]

    reynz September 12, 2007 at 11:47 am

    ghandee,

    am still learning. read mo yong entry ni Villoria.

    [Reply]

    sasha September 12, 2007 at 5:16 pm

    Magpapakilala muna ako… ako po ay si Sashing na napadpad dito dahil kay bluepanjeet at dahil panay kwento ni kuya lawrence sayo when we met :)

    Okay back to your twiittering bird heheheh

    You didn’t agree with them kaya ganyan natira ka hahahah… may mga feeling kasi “elitista” kaya ganyan… kala mo sila lang magagaling! hahaha

    Hay naku… marami pa sana akong gustong sabihin pero baka sabihin nila nakisawsaw ako hahahha… saka nasabi ko na kay bluep kaya malamang kwento nya sa yo :)

    Love your posts!!!

    [Reply]

    Baklang AJ September 12, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    I’m new in this Twiitaliceousness and if this is the place where cheezemax isn’t get taxed, then let’s axed most of these brainless twits who espouse nothing but animosities amongs bloggaciousness!!!!

    Hi Reynz, I agree with some of your points here but resorting to name-calling people who have twitter accounts seems like it is below the belt. I understand that you were also badmouthed, but a name-calling retaliation, not only your “nemesis” but the “twittersphere” in general is unfair. I have been using twitter for a while now and not all twitter users are brainless, and not all of us espouse animosity in the blogosphere. I resent the statement above, even if it does not directly refer to me.

    Yun lang po, bow. Peace :)

    P.S. Not everyone who uses twitter, and not everyone in the local blogosphere are blogging to earn.

    [Reply]

    Baklang AJ September 12, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    I’m new in this Twiitaliceousness and if this is the place where cheezemax isn’t get taxed, then let’s axed most of these brainless twits who espouse nothing but animosities amongs bloggaciousness!!!!

    Hi Reynz, I agree with some of your points here but resorting to name-calling people who have twitter accounts seems like it is below the belt. I understand that you were also badmouthed, but a name-calling retaliation, not only your “nemesis” but the “twittersphere” in general is unfair. I have been using twitter for a while now and not all twitter users are brainless, and not all of us espouse animosity in the blogosphere. I resent the statement above, even if it does not directly refer to me.

    Yun lang po, bow. Peace :)

    P.S. Not everyone who uses twitter, and not everyone in the local blogosphere are blogging to earn.

    [Reply]

    The Ca t September 12, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    The Google check is fake. I should know, I am looking right now the genunine Google check. The authorized signature is different from mine.

    [Reply]

    Jon Limjap September 12, 2007 at 11:14 pm

    Uy, salamat sa pag-add sakin sa twitter. :) Kita ko blog mo galing kay The Ca t.

    [Reply]

    unanimous_flip September 13, 2007 at 12:13 am

    Si Reynz talaga kahit saan mapadpad, may “besfren” lagi. Mapa filadelphia man o mapa blogging. Magnet ka yata ng “mababait” na soul. Sige nga macheck ang twiiter na yan at naging curious tuloy ako.

    [Reply]

    reynz September 13, 2007 at 2:29 am

    Ok AJ:
    Sorry late tong comment ko here, but we’re ok now dun sa edits ko sa taas ano? Apologies! Apologies! At bakit dalwa ang post mo? Ganun ang galit? HAHAHA

    Jon Limjap:
    nice meeting you! I’ll visit your blog!

    Unanimous_flip:
    Ewan ba’t me balat ang pwet ko! hehehe!

    [Reply]

    reynz September 13, 2007 at 2:30 am

    Cat,

    Ano ba yan? Sobrang sharp naten, takot na ako! Baka tiga Homeland Security ka? :-)

    [Reply]

    Chukchak Chenes September 13, 2007 at 2:31 am

    Ay naku sister, hindi ako si Prudencia, pero kilala ko siya. Mas bongga naman ang beauty ko kaysa sa kanya ‘no… Charing!

    [Reply]

    reynz September 13, 2007 at 2:50 am

    Chukchak!!!

    Chika lang yon, di mo kasi suot ang ID mo eh. :-)

    [Reply]

    The Ca t September 13, 2007 at 6:33 am

    Force of habit of being an auditor and accountant. These days, checks are signed electronically. With lots of checks to sign, the authorized signatory will be having stiff fingers signing thousands of checks. So there is no way by which the signatures will differ.

    Check writing is a module in an accounting software, there is no way by which the fonts would differ within the check.

    I can enumerate more discrepancies.

    When I was a kid, my favorite feature was spot the difference.

    [Reply]

    c 5 September 13, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    Cat, which check is fake?

    [Reply]

    Leave a Comment

    CommentLuv Enabled

    Previous post: Have you reach a verdict?

    Next post: It’s porno, not popcorn.